Headless Instead of Headache: How Modern CMS Solve Content Problems

Although monolithic CMS such as Typo3 (14% market share in Germany) and WordPress (over 60% market share worldwide) continue to dominate, they are increasingly reaching their limits in the face of modern requirements. With limited channels, slow updates, and rigid templates, traditional content management systems are holding back growth-oriented companies. The solution? Headless CMS.

Markus Schulz / Aug 13, 2025

Many marketing teams will be familiar with this scenario: the new product campaign is supposed to launch simultaneously on the website, app, newsletter, and social media. And the outdated CMS makes it a nightmare: the same content has to be created three times separately, the already heavily stretched development team has to be asked for help with every minor adjustment and three weeks pass before the campaign can finally go live. Meanwhile, the competition has long since reacted. What started as a decent content strategy becomes a costly bottleneck. A typical example of how outdated content management systems slow companies down instead of empowering them.

Legacy CMSs create three key obstacles for growth-oriented companies.

  • Intertwined structures that entangle teams in inefficient content processes—each channel requires separate processing, leading to bottlenecks and slowed workflows. 

  • Costly dependencies, as every technical adjustment ties up developer resources and blocks content teams. 

  • Outdated UI and a lack of personalization features make it difficult to efficiently adapt to modern market requirements. This combination of technical limitations and operational inefficiencies makes older systems difficult to use. The solution: a headless API-first CMS that offers the necessary adaptability and expandability to meet today's market requirements.

Monolithic content management systems were the beginning

Monolithic CMSs owe their widespread use to their undeniable advantages: their great versatility thanks to countless plugins and themes, their flexibility as open source systems, and their suitability for complex, multilingual websites have made them the first choice for many companies. Particularly valuable is the large, active community that continuously provides resources and offers quick support when problems arise.

It is precisely this monolithic architecture that is proving to be a liability today. The close integration of backend, frontend, and content inevitably leads to content silos—isolated content that cannot be seamlessly shared between platforms. Content teams encounter systematic barriers as a result: each piece of content must be created, maintained, and reviewed by different teams multiple times before it is available on different channels. This fragmentation prevents centralized management and forces teams into inefficient double work.The problem is exacerbated by the high level of technical complexity. Monolithic systems require extensive training and place high demands on development, meaning that content teams remain permanently dependent on web developers. These website-centric frameworks limit content to individual digital touchpoints and prevent genuine omnichannel strategies. Modern requirements such as AI integration or agile internationalization become cumbersome tasks that tie up resources instead of creating efficiency.

High maintenance costs, rising operating costs and a permanently high total cost of ownership make monolithic CMSs an investment risk. They simply cannot deliver what modern content strategies require: flexibility, speed, and true omnichannel capabilities for a dynamic market.

Headless API-First CMSs are the future

Modern headless CMSs differ fundamentally from monolithic content management systems in several aspects. The key difference lies in the strict separation of frontend and backend, which completely separates content management and presentation. This API-first architecture makes content available across platforms and prevents content silos, as the same content can be seamlessly delivered to web, mobile, social media, or IoT devices.

Leading systems such as Hygraph, Storyblok, Contentful and CoreMedia strategically utilize this modular, microservice-based structure. This gives developer teams more freedom to flexibly define content models, customize APIs, and quickly integrate new channels—all with independently updatable components. Another advantage is that technical adjustments no longer have to be carried out exclusively by developer teams – marketing and content teams can also perform many of these tasks independently. At the same time, content teams benefit from decoupling: they can create content once and deliver it consistently across all channels, enabling true omnichannel experiences.

The practical advantages are illustrated by these exemplary technology approaches from various headless CMS providers. Contentful, as a composable content platform, enables developers and companies to create content in a modular fashion and integrate it seamlessly into various channels via APIs. Storyblok minimizes technical barriers with no-code/low-code features and a real-time visual editor—teams can track changes live, test different views, and share preview links without leaving the platform. Hygraph relies on a native GraphQL approach for faster performance and precise data retrieval, allowing developers to retrieve multiple sources through a single API request. CoreMedia automates complex processes such as personalization, localization, and image processing through native AI features.

The fact that many of these systems are also available in the SaaS model ensures sustainable cost-effectiveness. Minimal operating and maintenance costs, high scalability, and modular architecture keep the total cost of ownership low in the long term and lead to significant long-term savings compared to monolithic systems.

More than just content: How a headless CMS creates real value

Content management systems have long been more than just tools for content management—they create added value in numerous areas of a company. The value of a CMS is reflected in the advantages it offers through key features such as user-friendliness, flexibility, scalability, integrability, and security.

Usability over complexity

A CMS should offer every team an intuitive user interface. This maximizes the output of editors and minimizes dependence on developers. The result is optimized, cross-team workflows.

Adaptation instead of rigid systems

Customized content models and reusable components provide the flexibility needed to quickly adapt to changing business requirements. CMS systems support a wide variety of platforms and channels, ensuring a consistent brand message and a seamless customer journey across all touchpoints.

Growth requires scalability

Presenting growing product catalogs across various channels and in international markets poses particular challenges for companies. An expanding company therefore needs a CMS that evolves with it and offers a scalable infrastructure. A CMS helps with the localization and centralized maintenance of multilingual content, as well as with the automatic distribution of region-specific product variants, and takes into account complex pricing for a global, consistent market presence. Cloud-native CMSs remain fast and reliable even with complex content and growing traffic.

Seamless integration

Open APIs and pre-built integrations enable effortless connection to existing tech stacks—from e-commerce platforms to marketing automation tools. This allows developers and editors to work with their preferred tools and frameworks.

Protection at all levels

CMS systems offer user-defined content stages, roles, and targeted access control for users to map complex editorial processes. Legally compliant document archiving, as well as regular updates and simplified maintenance on the technical side, ensure smooth and secure operation. This increases security against data leaks and attacks.

Monolithic or headless, that is the question

Traditional CMS (Typo3, Wordpress)

Modern CMS (Hygraph, Storyblok, Contentful, CoreMedia)

Usability

Complex learning curve, high development requirements, creating dependency between content teams and developer teams

Intuitive user interfaces with no-code/low-code features enable content teams and developer teams to work in parallel.

Flexibility

Monolithic architecture - Rigid workflows that require time-consuming and costly adjustments

Customized content models and reusable components that enable rapid adaptation to changing business requirements

Technical complexity

High resource requirements for operation and maintenance

SaaS model with fully managed infrastructure and automatic updates

Scalability

With growing content volumes or increasing requirements, performance reaches its limits and leaves little room for adaptation.

Scalable infrastructure thanks to cloud-native architecture that flexibly adapts to requirements and guarantees maximum performance even during peak loads and with complex content structures.

Integration capability

Limited AI integration, slow workflows, and rigid structures make it hard to roll out new features or designs.

Native AI features for content creation and workflow automation.

Open APIs with pre-built integrations to connect existing tech stacks.

Costs

High total cost of ownership due to maintenance, updates, and low scalability

Long-term savings through better scalability, lower maintenance costs, and modular architecture

Case Study: Simplicity

The partnership between Simplicity and Turbine Kreuzberg is an example of the successful implementation of the right CMS solution. As a pioneer in the industry behind the fashion brands OPUS and someday, Simplicity's content management requirements quickly outgrew their previous solution. This led to the task of evaluating new content management systems (CMS) at the end of 2020 and then implementing the one that was most suitable for this project.

Challenges

Simplicity used Spryker's commerce solution with a built-in CMS. This proved to be rather cumbersome and too complex for Simplicity's use cases. They needed a more agile CMS to gain greater adaptability and speed of innovation in a highly competitive market.

Solution

Storyblok offered the ideal solution: a user-friendly yet powerful CMS that provides ultimate flexibility to meet growing demands. Step-by-step integration ensured optimal implementation of Storyblok into Simplicity's existing tech stack. 

Storyblok's high adaptability and modular approach enable seamless integration of the new CMS into existing platforms and easy replacement of individual components for true composability. This allows you to deploy targeted best-of-breed solutions. 

The Visual Editor allows Simplicity to experiment with new designs and UX features, develop them further and flexibly implement market trends. At the same time, workflows have been optimized with reusable content blocks, while open API interfaces ensure data sovereignty across all content and channels. Simplicity gains the flexibility it needs to keep pace with its growth.

Efficient content management is the start – a future-proof CMS is the goal

Which modern content management system is right for a company depends largely on the individual requirements placed on the CMS. The actual added value of a CMS is evident in various areas of the company – whether in the efficiency of content creation, flexibility in delivery to different channels, support for multilingualism, or the integration of new technologies such as AI. Since monolithic systems can only provide many of these added values to a limited extent or not at all, they are not a suitable option for growth-oriented companies.

A CMS that fits a company's strategic goals and workflows not only offers technical functionalities, but also creates sustainable business value. Therefore, the selection of a CMS should always be based on which specific values—such as scalability, user-friendliness, automation, or future-proofing—offer the greatest added value for the company. 

Switching to a new, modular CMS solution is a crucial step toward future-proofing your business and successfully meeting the growing challenges of the market.

Simplicity: Content in Style with Storyblok

Case Study

CMS headaches?

Get in touch to learn more about Headless API-First CMS.

Markus Schulz